Web30 May 2024 · Rodgers v Leeds Laser Cutting Ltd: an employee was found not to have been automatically unfairly dismissed for refusing to attend work over concerns about the risk of Covid-19 to his vulnerable children.. The recent judgement of Rodgers v Leeds Laser Cutting Ltd is important as it is the first decision by an Employment Appeal Tribunal concerning … WebRodgers v Leeds Laser Cutting Ltd Free trial To access this resource, sign up for a free no-obligation trial today. Request a free trial Already registered? Sign in to your account. …
Rodgers v Leeds Laser Cutting l Employment Tribunal Case Law
Web21 Jun 2024 · Mr Rodgers was a laser operator, starting his employment with Leeds Laser Cutting Ltd in June 2024. He worked in a large warehouse, usually with four other colleagues at a time. The company did bring in an external specialist to carry out a risk assessment in March 2024, when the pandemic struck. Web20 Dec 2024 · The Claimant Darren Rodgers worked for the Respondent, Leeds Laser Cutting, as a laser operator. At the start of the Coronavirus pandemic in March 2024, the … call of cthulhu 2005
Dismissal for refusal to return to work - Moorcrofts
Web23 Jan 2024 · In March 2024, Leeds Laser Cutting Ltd (LLCL) informed staff it was putting in place measures to protect them from COVID-19. It asked employees to continue to work as normally as possible. Mr Rodgers was a laser operator, and could easily observe social distancing for the majority of his role. Web29 Jan 2024 · Rodgers v Leeds Laser Cutting Ltd [2024] 1 WLUK 594 (29 January 2024) Practical Law Case Page D-106-1498 (Approx. 1 page) Web16 Jun 2024 · Mr Rodgers worked as a laser operator for Leeds Laser Cutting Ltd in a large warehouse-type space with a small number of other employees. During lockdown, additional safety measures were introduced at the warehouse, including staggered start and finish times, social distancing and masks for staff if staff wanted to use them. call of cthulhu 2018 walkthrough